Whew, it's been a while. With that being said, I should have a lot of thoughts on NCAA hoops. Truthfully, I'm a little burnt out on college basketball right now. More on that some other time, maybe it's just a funk of some sort. I will trudge on today through some thoughts, predictions, and analysis nonetheless.
Conference tournaments actually start this week for a number of the one-bid leagues, like the Southern Conference, Big South, & Ohio Valley. The multi-bid Missouri Valley also cranks up in what should be a fun weekend. Tons of pressure on everyone participating in these leagues since so many of them earn only one bid.
A few quick thoughts on the brackets that will be released in two weeks:
- The 34 at-large spots are not set in stone. Yes, 34 bids will be given to teams that do not win conference tourneys. However, there are always teams who win league tournaments for multi-bid conferences that otherwise would not have been an at-large and essentially "steal" an at-large bid. For example: when counting the 31 automatic qualifiers, we would assume Gonzaga would win the West Coast Conference tournament. Since the Zags are a lock for making the tournament, they would not require a precious at-large bid because winning the league tourney automatically gets you in the Big Dance. Should the Zags lose, however, they will take up an at-large bid that no one is counting on at this point. This very scenerio happened in 2003 when San Diego upset the Zags in the WCC final, essentially stealing a bid by forcing Gonzaga to be one of the 34 at-large teams. Just keep this in mind when reading all the bracketologys and bracketographys.
- So who qualifies in the above description? Every major conference could see this happen, but many mid-major leagues have a higher probability of this occurring. Gonzaga, George Washington, Memphis, Air Force, Nevada, and possibly George Mason all come from leagues that will get one or two bids under normal circumstances. My bet is that at least two leagues steal an extra bid, essentially knocking two more at-large spots out (G Wash will not win the A-10 tourney, I promise).
- League tournaments also play a huge role in seeding. Take recent ACC teams for instance. Last year, NC State was projected "out" of the NCAA entering the ACC Tournament in DC. An openig round win plus an upset of Wake Forest and the WolfPack were a comfortable 10-seed. Two years ago, Maryland went from a projected 10-seed or so to a 4-seed by winning the ACC Tournament in Greensboro. My point is that seeding is very much up in the air entering Championship Week next week. Likewise for the so-called bubble teams.
With that out of the way, I have to make some predictions because that's all I can do since I'm not quite patient enough to just let things unfold. First of all, UCONN still looks like the best team. I do think a significant gap exists between [Duke, UCONN, 'Nova, Texas, & Memphis] and the rest of the decent teams. Sure, some other team could get hot and win four games. But, in the end, I just don't see anyone else winning the required six games to become Nat'l Champs. They certainly would have to go through more than one of those five teams to do so.
That being said, I still have a Five to Thrive for 2006. This is my personal gimmick of picking five teams that are not generally expected to make an extended run, but could, in my opinion, do so. Unfortunately, a lot will depend on the matchups for many of these teams. Last year, two of them played one another in the second round (Villinova & Florida). I was right on with Michigan St., but missed badly on Georgia Tech.
This year's Five to Thrive are a bit different. I actually identified four of these teams a few weeks ago and then forgot to post it. I am particularly intrigued by the young teams entering the tournament this year. Therefore, LSU, Kansas, and North Carolina are the first three of my list. I also decided a while back on Ohio St and they have played very well recently. But, I now think they are ripe for an early exit. I'll keep them on my list because they originally made it, but I am not convinced that the Buckeyes can block out the hype and win four games. Finally, I like Washington. The Huskies have, in my opinion, the most underrated great player in college basketball, Brandon Roy. I have seen him play a number of times this year and he is clutch late in games. They also have an experienced team in general, with five seniors I believe on the roster. Plus, this is a squad that advanced to the Sweet 16 last year. That makes my Five to Thrive: LSU, Kansas, UNC, Ohio St, and Washington. Honestly, I could see LSU making a deep run, but I'm not sure John Brady is a good enough coach to do it.
Finally, some random NCAA thoughts:
- Southern Cal could win the Pac-10 tournament; Minnesota could make a run in the Big Ten tourney.
- The CAA has three good teams: George Mason, UNC-W, and Hofstra. Only two will dance, and that's unfortunate.
- The Missouri Valley is either a deep league or an above-average league with no great team. I say watch Missouri State and Creighton come tourney time.
- W. Kentucky is pretty good. No coincidence that I have written about the Hilltoppers.
- Villinova plays harder than any team I have seen this year.
- No one is talking much about Texas. That is an error.
- I'm interested to see if any Big East teams besides UCONN and Villinova can advance past the Sweet 16. I have my doubts, I admit it. Likewise on the ACC other than Duke. Same for the SEC period.
- My current Elite Eight looks like this: Duke, UCONN, Villinova, Texas, LSU, Kansas, UCLA, and some fluke team (Missouri St anyone?).
Ok, that's enough. Trying to make up for too much time off. You all have a good one. Nod ya head to this.